VAT Notice 700/12: how to fill in and submit your VAT Return VAT Notice 700/1: should I be registered for VAT? You may find it helpful to read these notices on related subjects: This notice provides further details of the Making Tax Digital rules. Once you’ve submitted your return, you’ll receive confirmation through your software that it has been received. If your digital records are up to date, the software will be able to collate and prepare your return for you. communicating with HMRC digitally through our Application Programming Interface ( API) platform.preparing VAT Returns using the information maintained in those digital records.keeping and maintaining the records specified in the regulations.The software businesses use must be capable of: Making Tax Digital for VAT requires all VAT-registered businesses to keep records digitally and file their VAT Returns using software. It is not a standalone document and should be read alongside other VAT notices, especially those listed in paragraph 1.3. This notice gives guidance on the digital record keeping and return requirements for Making Tax Digital for VAT. Introduction 1.1 What this notice is about Unless otherwise indicated within the rule, all of the rules contained in this notice have the force of law from the date the regulations have the force of law. These rules are indicated by being placed in a box. Parts of this notice include rules that have the force of law under the regulations. 986), which amend the VAT Regulations 1995 (‘the regulations’). 261) and The Value Added Tax (Amendment) Regulations 2021 (2021 No. Interesting that my original code also works if you redo it with the variables taken out.This notice provides information further to the provisions of The Value Added Tax (Amendment) Regulations 2018 (SI 2018 No. Will spend a bit of time getting to know how the crossjoin function works, haven’t used it too much up until now. Looks like I better be a bit more careful using variables from now on. Thanks Harsh I’ve had a look through, a very comprehensive solution and works well. Below is the consolidated DAX measure alongwith the screenshot of the final results provided for the reference - Consolidated Budget - Harsh =ĭates >= CALCULATE( MIN( Budget ) ) &ĭates <= CALCULATE( MAX( Budget ) ) ) And then against those generated set of dates, budget figure for each day needs to be evaluated accordingly. For example, if budget month is from “ 1st July, 2022 - 31st July, 2022”, it needs to generate only 31 rows of dates for that given date range. So now, while fixing the measure we need to ensure that only row of date for each day is generated inside a date range of budget for that particular month. ![]() And to add to that misery, “ SUMX()” function summed-up the results of those possible combination of rows for that particular financial year. But on top of that, the other functions which you used inside that large measure just expanded the rows to all possible combination of dates. It means that, when you used/referenced/called a naked variable directly inside CALCULATE, it didn’t do anything in terms of evalaution with regards to that aspect. ![]() Here’s the converted DAX measure based on above provided formula - Incorrect Budgets =ĭATEDIFF( 'Budget', 'Budget', DAY ) + 1 ) ) My sample file attached sheet “daily budget” contains tables where the incorrect results are displayed:Ĭombination of Rows Between Dates column and Budgets & Budgets columns 643×1123 80.6 KBĪnd when you convert the above provided formula into a measure, it’ll yield the same wrong results which you were getting originally. If I then use small measure3 in a table, it returns correct results, but LargeMeasure’s results would be incorrect. This over simplified example measure returns incorrect results but If I split it into smaller measures, the results are correct, for example: Attempting to solve this, I tried to wrap variables within my larger measure in calculate but still have the same issue. ![]() Why do we need to separate some larger measures into smaller measures in order to get correct results? I have had a response this is query previously ( ) saying that completed measures get wrapped in a calculate and that’s the difference between combining measures into 1 larger measure and splitting them into smaller ones. I hope this question can be answered in theory but I also have attached an example PBI file of the incorrect results that I am getting.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |